On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 03:01:48PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I'm not sure anyone does that much in the way of time/date work that it'd > make a difference. Besides, we're talking internal here--time() may still > return Unix epoch seconds for compatibility reasons. Blah! I saw the prosal for an mjdate() routine and thought it was at the language level for some reason. This RFC should go to -internals so that I don't get confused that way :-) > We may have ints of various sizes. (Or we may make it look that way but > really fake it... :) Hard to say yet. As long as it Just Works from the language level, I don't care how it's done :-) my $i = 100_000_000_000_000_000; # big number! $i += 100_000_000_000_000_000; # even bigger! print "$i\n"; # Oh my gosh, it worked! -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Julian ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain int... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Jarkko Hietaniemi