Jon Ericson wrote: > Why not change @x so that it can represent other > types of arrays? For instance: > > my @x; # standard Perl array > my @y[2, 3]; # 2x3 matrix (syntax guess) > my FIFO @z; # FIFO stack (another guess) This is ENTIRELY my point: the more things a '@' can represent, the LESS information it carries; and there will come a point -- when perl6 is released, if not sooner -- when the symbol will be essentially content-free. So get rid of it. It's a waste. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jon Ericson