On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, John Porter wrote:
> Yes. OTOH, if it doesn't add *enough* information, it's not cost-
> effective. Most of proposals, such as highlander types and this 109,
> reduce the amount of info carried by the symbol to the point that it
> isn't worth having. Furthermore, if the OO nature of perl, as
> foreshadowed by perl5's tie-ing and lvalue subs, realizes its full
> potential, then being a "scalar", as indicated by a $, conveys
> essentially zero information.
Composer::Post.assumes(Iterator.each(Iterator.all(List)=="Programmers")
->programs=(Language::Programming.uses("Perl")==true &&
Methodology.implemented(Style.OO==true,Time.all==true)))==true;
--
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less li... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Karl Glazebrook
