My point is that I find the use of $x and @x visually confusing, and now
arrays are often objects anyway really confusing.
Also lots of $$x{'hmm'] and \@x[...] are no good.
This human wants less clutter!
Karl
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> The ultimate target of a program's source code is the *programmer*.
> Programmers, being people (well, more or less... :), work best with symbols
> and rich context. Stripping contextual clues out of code does the
> programmer a disservice. We're at the point where we don't have to cater to
> the limitations of the computer hardware. That means we'll be better off if
> we cater to the limitations (and strengths!) of people's wetware.
>
> Let's not move backwards and force people to work like machines. Instead,
> lets force machines to work like us.
>
> Dan
>
> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski even samurai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
> teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Clayton Scott
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Karl Glazebrook
