[replying from here since this is the only way I received it] > "Myers, Dirk" wrote: > > > > $line/pattern/ ; > > > /pattern/ ($line) ; I don't think these should be changed. Here's how I tend to pronouce things: $x = 'foo'; # "x gets foo" /bar/; # "match on bar" $x =~ /baz/; # "x gets matched on baz" C<=~> is a special case of "getting" something, where the something in question is an action instead of an expression. This symmetry should be kept. -- There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Steve Fink
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... skud
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... John Porter
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Decklin Foster
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Damian Conway
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? David Corbin
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Ken Fox
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Joe McMahon
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall