Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters.

[John Porter]

Nathan Wiger wrote:
> 
> I do think
> it's worth considering if we're dead-set on losing =~. 

But are we?  Have you looked at RFC139?  I hope the niceities of it 
for the perl programmer are more or less apparent.

-- 
John Porter

        We're building the house of the future together.