On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 08:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Eric Roode wrote:
>For that matter, let's drop chomp(), eh?
I already proposed that. Benchmarks show that reading a file with
explicit chomp() is easily 20% slower than reading the same file with
implicit chomp(), through the -l command line switch.
The problem is that reappending the newline at the end of the string,
for example through use of $\, is pretty slow, too.
--
Bart.
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
