Re: RFC 216 (v1) POD should tolerate white space.

[John Porter]

H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> Are we being clever again?
> Rephrase: "No empty lines".
> I know you understood, but ... (no, I won't say it)

Frankly, I thought it was absurd when I first wrote it...
but then I looked at again, and now I'm not so sure I dislike it!

=head1 CHANGES
  =over 4
    =item * Detailed implementation description
    =item * Add a new pragma 'varlock' for controlling the concurrency control.
  =back 4
=head1 DESCRIPTION

Looks transparent to me!

-- 
John Porter

        We're building the house of the future together.