> This reminds me of a related but rather opposite desire I have had > more than once: a quotish context that would be otherwise like q() but > with some minimal extra typing I could mark a scalar or an array to be > expanded as in qq(). I have wanted that also, although I don't remember why just now. (I think have some notes somewhere about it.) I will RFC it if you want. Note that there's prior art here: It's like Lisp's backquote operator.
- Conversion of undef() to string user overridable for ea... Bart Lateur
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Brad Hughes
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Steve Fink
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... David L. Nicol
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Peter Scott
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Eric Roode
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string us... Glenn Linderman