Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> This reminds me of a related but rather opposite desire I have had
> more than once: a quotish context that would be otherwise like q() but
> with some minimal extra typing I could mark a scalar or an array to be
> expanded as in qq(). For example doubling the $ and @? $$foo, @@bar?
> This comes in handy when you are generating big blocks of code on the
> fly but only tiny parts of it needs to be interpolated. Unfortunately
> the margin of my monitor is not enough to describe this wonderful idea
> in a form of a RFC.
$qqdString =~ s/\[(\w+)\]/defined($vars{$1})?$vars{$1}:"[$1]"/ge;
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"After jotting these points down, we felt better."
- Conversion of undef() to string user overridable for ea... Bart Lateur
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Brad Hughes
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Steve Fink
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... David L. Nicol
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Peter Scott
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Eric Roode
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string us... Glenn Linderman
