>POD, presumably. Or maybe son-of-POD; it would be nice to have better >support for tables and lists. We did this for the camel. Which, I remind the world, was written in pod. ''tom
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Tad McClellan
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Tad McClellan
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for document... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docu... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... Andrew Wilson
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Jonathan Scott Duff