Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[Simon Cozens]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:26:40AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> Oh, that's a terrific improvement.
> Basically you want to change (= break) the current precedence
> of the comma operator.  Thank you, Mr. Language Designer.

John, settle down. None of us profess to be fantastic language designers,
which is why we gave Larry the job. That being done, I'm not entirely sure why
people are continuing to argue about these things. :)

-- 
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years
of careful development."
(By [EMAIL PROTECTED])