Dave Mitchell wrote: > The main thrust of that was whether a PDD on coding conventions > should have sections on: >... > * Performance guidelines > > ...I guess we can safely dispense with that last entry. No, performance guidelines are probably still appropriate; but doing hand-coded peephole optimizations is not the Right Thing. As Jarkko, said: > > Optimizing by > > choosing good algorithms and data structures, yes -- John Porter
- What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transforms) Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Dave Mitchell
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian ... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian ... Juanma Barranquero
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian tran... Piers Cawley
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian ... Dan Sugalski