On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:12:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> In fact, I've come up with the same idea independently. Except I'd go a
> bit further and claim that only a native English speaker could possibly
> come up with the idea that irregularity is useful.
I'd say that only a linguist could possibly come up with the idea. :)
> It's most definitely not.
Then you'll have no problems with these little teasers:
1) Name one perfectly regular natural language. ("Natural" in the sense of
"having native speakers")
2) Explain why, if people *want* regularity, the evolution of natural
languages has tended *away* from regularity in almost all circumstances.
--
The sky already fell. Now what? -- Steven Wright
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity David Grove
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Brian
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Otto Wyss
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity James Mastros
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Brian
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Kai Henningsen
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Brian
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity p . carmichael
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Phil . Moore
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity Uri Guttman
- Re: Perl culture, perl readabillity John Porter
