On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Dave Storrs wrote: > We could then just add a -7 flag. That's not necessarily bad; > Perl 7 will probably face the same issue...it needs to be able to eat Perl > [567] code without barfing, but it needs to know what it's getting. Also, > the flag would be a good choice in that it's very human-readable. More readable than the already-supporrted -M7 ? Do we *really* need a new command-line option that is one character shorter than an existing command-line option that can do exactly the same thing? -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Damian Conway
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dave Storrs
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 jc vazquez
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter