Re: Tying & Overloading

[David L. Nicol]

Larry Wall wrote:
> (And juxtaposition is out because we're not going to destroy indirect
> object syntax

How often is indirect object syntax used without some whitespace? Having
the perl5->perl6 converter locate it and insert a space shouldn't be too
very tricky.


        $these=$this$that$the_other;

is what we've been doing inside double quotes for years. Making
butted-against-each-other be the string concatenation operator looks
good IMO.




> I'm thinking concat will be ~.  Furthermore, I'm thinking unary ~ will
> be stringify.

Not unary diglyph \" ?