On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:22:12PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Will there be confusion with the _ that means "the file statted by
> the last -X test?" I doubt it: file tests need to bind tighter than
> the concat op and the problem is over.
Hey, that would make "_ _ __" legal Perl code. Abigail, Abigail!
(I still prefer ~, but acknowledge that this is just bikeshed painting.)
--
In related wibbling, I can see an opening for the four lusers of the
Apocalypse... "I didn't change anything", "My e-mail doesn't work",
"I can't print" and "Is the network broken?".
- Paul Mc Auley
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Nathan Wiger
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g David L. Nicol
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Simon Cozens
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Michael G Schwern
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g John Porter
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damian Conway
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
