On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:35:24AM +0000, Fred Heutte wrote: > Bart Lateur's response summarizes well what I've heard so far > from responses both to the list and privately: > > (1) Yes, ~ *is* somewhat used in its current role as the bitwise > negation (complement) operator. > > (2) No, that doesn't appear to overlap my proposal for its use > as a successor to -> as now used. You don't get it. We are not looking for a single char to replace -> We WANT to use . Graham.
- a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Casey West
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Nathan Wiger
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g David L. Nicol
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Simon Cozens
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Michael G Schwern
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g John Porter
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damian Conway