On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:30:07PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:05:29AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> > Michael G Schwern writes:
> > : (grep {...} @stuff)[0] will work, but its inelegant.
> >
> > It's inelegant only because the slice doesn't know how to tell the
> > iterator it only needs one value. If it did know, you'd call it
> > elegant. :-)
>
> I'd call it Haskel! I've just installed it and have been skimming the
> docs.
>
> Would be neat if: my($first) = grep {...} @list; knew to stop itself, yes.
Yes. This could probably fall out of the suggestion that wantarray (or want)
return how many elements are wanted in a list context
Graham.
- Please make "last" work in "grep&quo... Alexander Farber (EED)
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... James Mastros
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Uri Guttman
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... David L. Nicol
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Larry Wall
