On Wed, 2 May 2001 17:05:31 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: >wantarray-ness is already passed along the call stack today. Thats >the whole point of it. So what is the difference in passing a number >instead of a boolean ? Because you might have a wantarray situation that expects no values? () = whateveryouwant(); You can always expect one more than is on the LHS. How is this currently handled with split()? -- Bart.
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Uri Guttman
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... David L. Nicol
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Damian Conway