On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:04:40PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Simon Cozens wrote:
> > A scalar's a thing.
> Just as the index into a multiplicity is a thing.
Indeed, hashes have scalar keys. Did you not realise that I conveyed
the same information in amazingly less confusing terminology?
Again, you oughta teach this stuff. :)
--
Jenkinson's Law:
It won't work.
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
