Dave Storrs wrote: > being backwards compatible is unlikely to > _cost_ us adherents and might well gain us some. Yes, all other things being equal. But will they be? IOW: at what cost backwards compatibility? -- John Porter
- Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) James Mastros
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) John Porter
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) Dave Storrs
- John Porter