Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2

[Damian Conway]

John Siracusa wrote:

   > Okay, this part has me confused.  

And rightly so: it was a screw-up. I lost track of whether I was keeping
the property on the value or on the node reference and ended up doing both.

Interestingly, the code would still have *worked* since the (originally
unset) property on the node reference would have returned C<undef> which
would undergo the usual boolean conversion in the C<if>, and the usual
promotion to zero in the numerical context of the increment.

Anyway, a patch is winging it's way to Simon even as I type.

Thanks for pointing out the snafu, John.

Damian