Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > I forget... has the possibility/utility of having nested namespaces > been discussed? Not sure; probably... but we'd need not just *nested* namespaces, but namespace *scoping*. Perhaps this could be done by allowing to attach a name to q lexical scope; perhaps this could be conflated with normal labels. -- John Porter
- Anyone actually experienced with object inheritance? schwern
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... John Porter
- RE: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... David Whipp
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inh... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Damien Neil
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... John Porter
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... John Porter
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... John Porter
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Bart Schuller
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inh... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inh... Joe McMahon
- RE: Anyone actually experienced with object inherit... Hong Zhang
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inh... David L. Nicol
- Re: Anyone actually experienced with object inh... Michael G Schwern