[NOTE: BCCing off-list to protect private email addresses]
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 09:07, Ken Fox wrote:
> Does the following example backtrack into <foo>?
>
> rule foo { b+ }
> rule bar { a <foo> b }
This was the bit that got me on-board. I did not see the need for
backtracking into rules until he pulled out that darn C<+>. Until then I
was convinced that you could just step over the sub-rule in backtracking
and treat it as atomic. Lack of formal education is biting me here. :(
I await the response with interest.
