On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brad Hughes wrote: : Larry Wall wrote: : [...] : > Maybe we should ... to mean "and so on forever": : > : > @a[0...; 0...:10; 0...:100] : > : > Except then we couldn't use it to mean what Ruby means by it, which : > might be handier in real life. : : No more yada-yada-yada?
Still have yada-yada-yada. That's ... when a term is expected, not when an
operator is expected. Just don't write
1,2,3...
when you mean
1,2,3,...
Or vice versa.
Larry
