Buddha Buck wrote:
Brent Dax wrote:
Incorrect.
Hmmm, I must have misunderstood Damian's suggestion when he said
(quoting Damian Conway)
Suppose ~> takes its left argument and binds it to
the end of the argument list of its right argument,
then evaluates that right argument and returns the result.
So an L2R array-processing chain is:
@out = @a ~> grep {...} ~> map {...} ~> sort;
I didn't read that as stating a semi-equivalence between '~>' and '.'.
I guess I live and learn.
No. Your reading was correct. This is a rare case of Brent being mistaken.
Damian
