>The IEEE-float-style infinities are quite sufficient for most purposes >One thing I agree is that writing 1..Inf is a *bit* sloppy since the >range operator n..m normally produces the numbers i for which >n <= i <= m while n..Inf gives n <= i < Inf
>but I can live with it I could sure save myself a lot of typing by reading ahead to message N+1 before answering message N. :-) --tom PS: For all N. :-):-)
