Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Parrot Calling Convention Confusion >> ... -- I thought they were exactly the same as an unprototyped call, >> but you invoke the return continuation (P1) instead of P0, the other >> registers are set up exactly as if you were making an unprototyped >> function call. > > Unfortunately the call and return conventions are *not* symmetric - yet. > S. F<docs/ppds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod>.
Well, yeah, but Dan's said they will be. [ Gives Dan a Paddingtonesque Hard Stare ]
