Luke Palmer writes: > Uri Guttman writes: > > > >>>>> "DC" == Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > DC> @sorted = sort {-M}=>{$^b cmp $^a} @unsorted; > > > > but there is no comma before @unsorted. is that correct? > > Yes. Commas may be ommitted on either side of a block when used as an > argument.
That's what I thought too. But Damian gave exactly the opposite answer to Uri's question, claiming he'd made a typo and a comma would be required. So which is it -- is Luke right in saying that Damian was right in the first place? Or is Damian right in saying that his example was wrong? Smylers