On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> I was thinking about the case where you use a module, only to define a
> class that you then instantiate like this:
>
> use Some::Module::That::Defines::A::Class;
> our Some::Module::That::Defines::A::Class $foo := new;
>
> and I keep thinking that that's too redundant. It's not so much that I
> want to syntax-golf it down, but there's just no reason to throw that
> type around twice, when what you really WANT to say is "that module over
> there is a class, instantiate me one."
>
> So, I was wondering about a synonym, like:
>
> uses Some::Module::That::Defines::A::Class $foo;
How about this?
my :autouse Some::Module::That::Defines::A::Class $foo;
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
