On 5/7/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might not be a problem -- I'm thinking we may end up tokenizing > most or all of the meta operators, so that [+] would be considered > its own token, and then the "longest matching token" rule > would be sufficient to disambiguate the terms: > > $x = [+1, -2, +3]; # token [ indicates a term > $y = [+] @stuff; # token [+] indicates a meta-op prefix operator
Does that mean postfix meta-ops that modify syntax become possible? (Not necessarily a good idea, mind you, but possible...) Stuart