On 5/7/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might not be a problem -- I'm thinking we may end up tokenizing
> most or all of the meta operators, so that [+] would be considered
> its own token, and then the "longest matching token" rule
> would be sufficient to disambiguate the terms:
> 
>   $x = [+1, -2, +3]; # token [ indicates a term
>   $y = [+] @stuff; # token [+] indicates a meta-op prefix operator

Does that mean postfix meta-ops that modify syntax become possible?
(Not necessarily a good idea, mind you, but possible...)


Stuart

Reply via email to