Austin Hastings wrote:
> Or, to put it another way: what hard problem is it that you guys are
> actively avoiding, that you've spent a week talking about making
> substantial changes to the language in order to facilitate lining up
> method names?

That's a very good point too.

Initially it's just a cute idea for filling in the 2-character method
invocation gap, as well as making $x.+method and $x.:method line up, but
it's probably not worth people's time in arguing this any further...
Consider my suggestion retracted, and sorry for the disturbance in the
force. :)

Thanks,
Audrey

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to