jerry gay wrote: > for the latest spec changes regarding this item, see > http://perlcabal.org/svn/pugs/revision/?rev=27959. > > is everyone equally miserable now? ;)
Already seen it. My latest points still stand, though: #`(...) is still vulnerable to ambiguity relative to #..., whereas `#(...), `#...#`, or (#...) don't share the same vulnerability. -- Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
