Raiph Mellor <raiph.mel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyhoo, I'd love to see a session of brainstorming, with nitty gritty > detail, about possible ways to get what you guys and Mark and I and > perhaps others think we would like to see in the way of super tightly > woven together comments and code, where said brainstorming initially > works within the creative constraint of leveraging the P6 spec as is, > plus reasonable extrapolation of unspecced bits. Think grammar > morphing, aspects of macros, the existing unfinished POD6 spec, and > any other relevant existing bits I'm forgetting.
Excellent idea. But may I suggest you perhaps might like to hold off that discussion until next week? @Larry had some very fruitful discussions about the long-overdue Pod spec during YAPC::EU last week and, as a result, I plan to (finally!!!) release a new version of S26 this week-end. I very much hope that this new revision will satisfy The Overmeer Desiderata [1] too. Damian [1] Sounds like a Robert Ludlum novel, eh?
