On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:52:26PM -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > That's a good idea. I wish you'd have mentioned it while the RFC could > still be changed. :) Shouldn't be a problem; we don't have to stop having ideas now October first is past, I hope. -- There seems no plan because it is all plan. -- C.S. Lewis
- RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in... David Grove
- Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquir... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Ac... Bradley M. Kuhn
- RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should b... Simon Cozens
- RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquir... David Grove
- Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Ac... Simon Cozens
- RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquir... David Grove
- Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Ac... Simon Cozens
- RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquir... David Grove
- Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Ac... Simon Cozens