perl6-licenses  

Messages by Date

• 2014/04/03 Re: License: Perl5 or Perl6 Tobias Leich
• 2006/12/04 Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message you sent. NAVMSE-ZEUS
• 2003/02/27 is the AL v2 complete/finished yet owenberesford
• 2001/10/22 Minor bugfix to the Artistic-2.0 proposal Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/25 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensingissues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/24 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) John van V
• 2001/01/19 Re: Public Apology David Grove
• 2001/01/19 Re: Public Apology Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/18 Re: Public Apology David Grove
• 2001/01/18 Public Apology Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/17 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/17 Re: feedback and the license of Perl (was Re: licensing issues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/16 feedback and the license of Perl (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/16 Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/16 Re: The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues) Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/16 Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/16 Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/15 Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/15 Re: The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues) David Grove
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensingissues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/15 The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 intent of a non-legally binding licensing charter (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/15 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/15 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/15 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/15 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/15 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensingissues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/14 Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Nathan Torkington
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensingissues) Nathan Torkington
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensingissues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/14 Re: Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re:licensing issues) Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/14 Please stay on topic (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/14 Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re: licensing issues) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Nick Ing-Simmons
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Nick Ing-Simmons
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
• 2001/01/14 non-licensing issues ? Nick Ing-Simmons
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
• 2001/01/14 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/13 Re: licensing issues Kai Henningsen
• 2001/01/13 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/12 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/10 Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC Simon Cozens
• 2001/01/10 Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/10 Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC Russ Allbery
• 2001/01/10 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/10 Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC Ben Tilly
• 2001/01/10 AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC John van V
• 2001/01/09 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/09 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/09 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/09 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/08 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/08 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/08 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/08 Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2001/01/08 Re: licensing issues David Grove
• 2001/01/07 Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
• 2001/01/07 Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
• 2001/01/07 Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/07 Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
• 2001/01/05 Re: licensing issues Dan Sugalski
• 2001/01/05 Re: licensing issues John van V
• 2001/01/05 public domain? (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/05 licensing issues (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2001/01/05 Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
• 2001/01/04 Re: standard representations David Grove
• 2001/01/04 Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Simon Cozens
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Simon Cozens
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/06 RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name David Grove
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Simon Cozens
• 2000/10/06 RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name David Grove
• 2000/10/06 RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name David Grove
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Simon Cozens
• 2000/10/06 Re: ActivePerl License (was Re: RFC idea) Philip Newton
• 2000/10/06 Re: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Simon Cozens
• 2000/10/03 Re: Update on the RFC Process Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/03 Re: RFC 346 (v2) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/03 ActivePerl License (was Re: RFC idea) Jan Dubois
• 2000/10/03 RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Ask Bjoern Hansen
• 2000/10/02 Re: RFC 346 (v2) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Bart Lateur
• 2000/10/01 RFC 354 (v2) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/10/01 RFC 346 (v2) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/10/01 Differences between Artistic-2.0beta4 and Artistic-2.0beta3 Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/01 Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/10/01 Re: Why (7) and (8) in the Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0)) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/30 RFC 343 (v2) New Perl Mascot Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/30 RE: RFC 354 (v1) A Trademark on Perl Should be Acquired in Larry Wall's Name David Grove
• 2000/09/30 Re: new perl mascot Simon Cozens
• 2000/09/30 new perl mascot Gerrit Haase
• 2000/09/30 RE: new perl mascot David Grove
• 2000/09/30 Re: RFC idea Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 RE: Why (7) and (8) in the Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0)) David Grove
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) David Grove
• 2000/09/29 RE: Issues of (6c) in Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0)) David Grove
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 Changes from 2.0beta2 to 2.0beta3 Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 Why (7) and (8) in the Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0)) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 Issues of (6c) in Artistic-2.0 (was Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0)) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot David Grove
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) David Grove
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) David Grove
• 2000/09/29 RFC 346 (v1) Perl6's License Should be (GPL|Artistic-2.0) Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/29 RFC 219 (v2) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/29 RFC 211 (v2) The Artistic License Must Be Changed Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Mike Lacey
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Rocco Caputo
• 2000/09/29 RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Garrett Goebel
• 2000/09/29 Re: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Tim Conrow
• 2000/09/28 RE: RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot David Grove
• 2000/09/28 RFC 343 (v1) New Perl Mascot Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/28 RFC 13 (v2) The Copyright and Licensing Working Group Perl6 RFC Librarian
• 2000/09/27 Artistic License section-by-section comparison to new license Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/27 Version 2.0beta2 of my proposed Artistic License (was Re: My proposed Artistic License) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/27 Commentary on how my proposed AL compares to Ben's proposed AL Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/27 My proposed Artistic License Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea Philip Newton
• 2000/09/26 Re: RFC idea Philip Newton
• 2000/09/26 Re: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/26 Re: time to show my ignorance (was RE: RFC idea) Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/26 Re: time to show my ignorance (was RE: RFC idea) Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/26 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/26 Re: time to show my ignorance (was RE: RFC idea) Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 time to show my ignorance (was RE: RFC idea) Dave Storrs
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 got sidetracked Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Russ Allbery
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Simon Cozens
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Simon Cozens
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 Re: RFC idea Simon Cozens
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea David Grove
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
• 2000/09/25 RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor

• Earlier messages