On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 01:35:42AM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: > Background: RFCs should be in development until frozen or retired. > > Problem: Frozen RFCs are being updated. Solution #4: Slip the RFC status back to 'developing'. If someone updates a frozen RFC, its obviously developing again. The new RFC will require review. Then the maintainer can change the status back to frozen, or continue updating. 'Biologists have a term for things which are stable. It is "dead".' -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse I worship Satan and Santa likes me better than you. -- Diablo www.goats.com
- Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Adam Turoff
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Michael G Schwern
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Jeremy Howard
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses John Porter
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Stat... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Adam Turoff
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Adam Turoff
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Dave Storrs
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Adam Turoff
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Nathan Torkington
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses Adam Turoff
- Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Stat... Nathan Torkington