Messages by Date
-
2000/10/12
Re: Update on Larry's talk
Piers Cawley
-
2000/10/12
Re: Reading list
Carlos Ramirez
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
Ask Bjoern Hansen
-
2000/10/11
RE: Continued RFC process
Bryan C . Warnock
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
Bryan C . Warnock
-
2000/10/11
Re: Reading list
Uri Guttman
-
2000/10/11
Re: Reading list
Carlos Ramirez
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
David Grove
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
David Grove
-
2000/10/11
Re: Update on Larry's talk
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/11
Re: Reading list
Russ Allbery
-
2000/10/11
Re: Update on Larry's talk
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
RE: Continued RFC process
Dave Rolsky
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
David Grove
-
2000/10/11
Re: Reading list
Joe McMahon
-
2000/10/11
RE: Reading list
Peter Buckingham
-
2000/10/11
Re: Update on Larry's talk
Buddha Buck
-
2000/10/11
Re: Update on Larry's talk
John Porter
-
2000/10/11
RE: Continued RFC process
Glen
-
2000/10/11
Update on Larry's talk
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
Stephen Zander
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/11
Re: Reading list
Nicholas Clark
-
2000/10/11
RE: Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/11
Re: Now and then
John Porter
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
John Porter
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
John Porter
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
John Porter
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
Piers Cawley
-
2000/10/11
Re: Continued RFC process
Piers Cawley
-
2000/10/10
Re: Now and then
Uri Guttman
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
RE: Now and then
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/10
RE: Now and then
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Reading list
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/10
Reading list
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/10
Now and then
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Bryan C . Warnock
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Tad McClellan
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Daniel Chetlin
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Russ Allbery
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Russ Allbery
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Russ Allbery
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
David's paranoia again (was Re: Continued RFC process)
Randal L. Schwartz
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Will Coleda - IMG
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Will Coleda - IMG
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Dave Storrs
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Ask Bjoern Hansen
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dave Storrs
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Stephen Zander
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Nicholas Clark
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Uri Guttman
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Peter Buckingham
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
John Barnette
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Andy Dougherty
-
2000/10/10
RE: Continued RFC process
Andy Dougherty
-
2000/10/10
Re: Continued RFC process
Bart Lateur
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
John Porter
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Stephen Zander
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
John Porter
-
2000/10/09
RE: Continued RFC process
David Grove
-
2000/10/09
Re: Continued RFC process
Uri Guttman
-
2000/10/08
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/08
Re: Continued RFC process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/08
Re: Continued RFC process
Uri Guttman
-
2000/10/08
Continued RFC process
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/05
Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation instead of POD
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/10/05
Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation instead of POD
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/04
Improving Perl6 RFCs (was: ...)
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/04
Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation instead of POD
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/04
RE: RFC Process Improvements (was Re: RFC 357)
David Grove
-
2000/10/04
Re: RFC Process Improvements (was Re: RFC 357)
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/04
RFC Process Improvements (was Re: RFC 357)
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Bryan C . Warnock
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Piers Cawley
-
2000/10/03
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/02
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Simon Cozens
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Jan Dubois
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
John Porter
-
2000/10/01
RE: Undermining the Perl Language
David Grove
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Stephen Zander
-
2000/10/01
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2000/10/01
Re: Update on the RFC Process
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/10/01
Update on the RFC Process
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Bart Lateur
-
2000/10/01
RE: Undermining the Perl Language
David Grove
-
2000/10/01
RE: Undermining the Perl Language
David Grove
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
Adam Turoff
-
2000/10/01
Re: Undermining the Perl Language
J. David Blackstone
-
2000/09/30
Re: regexp RFCs: freeze 'em or lose 'em
Kåre Olai Lindbach
-
2000/09/29
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
iain truskett
-
2000/09/29
The overall RFC process (was Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...)
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Daniel Chetlin
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
iain truskett
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Daniel Chetlin
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Dan Sugalski
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Daniel Chetlin
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/28
I had forgotten John Macdonald's description of Perl 6
mjd
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Stephen Zander
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Stephen Zander
-
2000/09/28
Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/28
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/28
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
H . Merijn Brand
-
2000/09/27
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/27
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Nicholas Clark
-
2000/09/27
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/27
Re: You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Piers Cawley
-
2000/09/26
You know what? I think I learnt something today.
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/25
[Fwd: A.Word.A.Day--hyperbaton]
David L. Nicol
-
2000/09/20
Re: Schedule
Michael G Schwern
-
2000/09/20
UPDATE: Overdue RFCs
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/20
Schedule
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/19
Re: Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Ben Tilly
-
2000/09/19
Re: Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/19
Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2000/09/19
Re: Perl without perl
David L. Nicol
-
2000/09/19
Re: 'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Piers Cawley
-
2000/09/19
Re: 'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/19
Re: 'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Piers Cawley
-
2000/09/19
UPDATE: RFC Status
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/19
Perl without perl
Michael G Schwern
-
2000/09/19
Overdue RFCs
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
No, not A, but A
David L. Nicol
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
Re: 'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/18
Re: 'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Accessing a variable's attributes (was Re: RFC 241 (v1) ...)
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Accessing a variable's attributes (was Re: RFC 241 (v1) ...)
Simon Cozens
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Accessing a variable's attributes (was Re: RFC 241 (v1) ...)
Nathan Torkington
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Dave Storrs
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
John Porter
-
2000/09/18
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Jeremy Howard
-
2000/09/18
'Markers'/RFC prototypes
Piers Cawley
-
2000/09/17
Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Michael G Schwern
-
2000/09/17
Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses
Adam Turoff
-
2000/09/15
RFC 240 (v1) Form a documentation working group to edit, clean, and produce
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/15
Update: Wrapping up -data RFCs
Jeremy Howard