On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:54:36PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Not necessarily. Nat recently posted about his misinterpretation of
> Larry's plans but said he still planned to lean on people to finish by
> October 1 otherwise they'd never get done.
Yuh, I just realised that the bulk of the ones I have to write are internals
and Unicode, and there's only a couple of language. And documentation.
Why isn't there a documentation w/g? Yes, this is a hint.
--
The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what
you want.
-- D. Cohen
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Simon Cozens
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close ... iain truskett
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting cl... iain truskett
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Dan Sugalski
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Stephen Zander
- Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here... Adam Turoff
- The overall RFC process (was Re: *REALLY*,... Nathan Wiger
