On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, David Grove wrote: [public voting] > Good? Bad? as someone who in a former life was part of creating news groups and such I can only say bad things about "public voting" in an environment like this. It just doesn't work and just doesn't measure anything useful. If you can answer Who should be able to vote and why? How do you control that only those people vote? then we can move on to the next obstacles. There is plenty to go. The whole concept is just flawed. Votes like this is in best case just a skewed opinion poll. Besides, we already got consensus that we don't like it some months ago on the bootstrap list. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/> more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Russ Allbery
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Wiger
- Re: Continued RFC process Will Coleda - IMG
- RE: Continued RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- RE: Continued RFC process Dave Storrs
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process Andy Dougherty
- Re: Continued RFC process Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process John Porter
- Re: Continued RFC process Bart Lateur
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Stephen Zander
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Tad McClellan
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process John Porter