On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 03:00:05PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > Again, We'll have continued discussion, but what the perl development > project needs right now is a swift kick of *direction* from larry. And I'm > pretty sure that he knows this. I thought part of the idea was that we become self-motivating, and "bus-proof". > ps - and as far as I'm concerned, there are two great decision points that > could be made early on && made public for perl's design: > > (1) that perl is a 'micro-architecture' where the perl runtime This is RFC 315. > (2) that the perl parser is pluggable This is RFCs 314 and 329. I wonder what foresighted individual came up with them. :) -- <gnat> TorgoX: you're rapidly learning, I see, that XML is a fucking piece of festering shit which has no more justification for walking God's clean earth than a dung beetle with diarrhoea.
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" on Perl brian d foy
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" on Perl Eric S. Raymond
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" on Pe... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" o... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" o... brian d foy
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programming&quo... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programmin... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programmin... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... John Porter
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programmin... Adam Turoff
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Dan Sugalski
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Kirrily Skud Robert
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Nathan Torkington