Graham Barr wrote: > > This would > > appear largely transparent to the user, right up until they tried to do > > isa() or ref() tests on the object. > > But that is the catch. Now if the language was to give us a way to support > both in the same package in an efficient way, so much the better. > > Graham. Or if the language allowed us stronger "typing" than associating an associative array with a set of methods.
- Re: How to implement both object... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: How to implement both ob... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both ob... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: How to implement both ob... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both ob... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: How to implement both ob... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both ob... John Berthels
- Re: How to implement both ob... Tim Bunce
- Re: How to implement both ob... Michael Fowler
- Re: How to implement both ob... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both ob... David L. Nicol
- Re: How to implement both ob... Tim Bunce
- Re: How to implement both ob... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Michael Fowler
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: How to implement both object->... Hildo Biersma
- Re: How to implement both object->method and m... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->method and module... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: How to implement both object->method and module... Michael Fowler