yary wrote: > Sounds like a spectest is in order to prevent that case from > happening, didn't see one in http://perlcabal.org/syn/S03.html (not > that that's the definitive place to look for tests, but that's why I'm > posting instead of DIY)
There are tests in t/spec/S03-operators/flip-flop.t, but I never really looked at them, and can't assess their quality or fittingness in a few minutes. Feel free to hack away. Moritz >>However, I can well >> imagine an implementation botching the cloning of the loop body by >> assuming it's static and not cloning it. That would not be Perl 6, >> since in Perl 6 every block is assumed to be a closure, and C<for> >> is assumed to work just like C<map>, which will certainly clone >> its closure....
