William Michels <w...@caa.columbia.edu> wrote: > Yes, since I was working in the REPL, I tried compacting Joe's code by > eliminating the "my %stash" line at the top, and adding "my" to the third > line.
I noticed the additional "my" in there, but I wouldn't have been able
to tell you why it was behaving like it was...
On the plus side, I see that if you tried to do that in a script, it
would warn you:
Potential difficulties:
Redeclaration of symbol '%stash'
