On 4/20/2010 7:35 PM, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> I'd recommend going nowhere near this idea!
>
> Karl
>

That way dragons lie!  At this point is when it is
useful to have the PDL build process a bit more smooth
on all platforms...

> On 20/04/2010, at 4:40 AM, Matthew Kenworthy wrote:
>
>>
>> Another option would be to embed a complete perl inside SciKarl, but
>> that has its own headaches!
>>
>>
>> Well, I was sort of considering making SciKarl so that it was a completely 
>> local installation with it's own perl inside the User's directory, but then 
>> I'd have to maintain my own perl and all the modules for *that*, and 
>> although it's okay for me, it breaks the main purpose of SciKarl, i.e. 'one 
>> click and it's done'.
>>
>> I guess you could add an option for 'which perl distribution do you want to 
>> put SciKarl into' but that's now waaay beyond my resources.
>>
>> Ahhhhhh (imagine a long Wilhelm scream here). So, thanks again for
>> your build notes. I hope to make some headway using those.
>>
>>
>> Good luck! I'm stuck with the 'plplot' compile problem at the moment.
>>
>> Matt

_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to