Matthew Kenworthy <[email protected]> wrote: > I think treating the PODs as the 'ground truth' documents from which > all other formats are generated could be the way to go. So I suggest > this: > > Remove the half-completed PDL books from the wiki pages completely.
+1 > I'd be willing to go through the PDL > books, pull out the great examples and POD ify them, so that the PODs > can be wikified automatically. Yay. This brings a related question: Is it better to PODify the wiki or wikify the POD? One way or the other, I think the documentation should be all developed in one place (POD + git, or wiki) and then either convert the POD to wiki or convert the wiki to POD. One way or the other we would have to move some documents. The wiki and the POD both have good documents that are worth keeping. I'll leave it to others to weigh the pros and cons of using POD or the wiki. You understand the issues better than I do. Daniel. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
