Hi Karl- Thanks for the example, it loaded fine.
The question isn't whether the new shell can do any Perl or PDL code---it can, including do 'filename'. The issue is if that code uses any perldl v1 features that have not yet been implemented in pdl2. Some examples that come to mind: * use of @PERLDL::AUTO routines * $PERLDL::PROMPT setting * $PERLDL::HISTFILESIZE * $PERLDL::ESCAPE * preproc_add/preproc_del * ... Those are all on the port list, it just takes time. I figured to start with the ones people were actually using first. --Chris On 6/18/2010 1:04 PM, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > I have not been following this discussion but I have a > naive question. Why shouldn't it work for any .perldlrc? > Isn't it just equivalent to 'do'. > > I attach mine FYI, I do have some quite complex > local.perldlrc's but they depend on various local data. > I can supply at least an example if you like _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
