On 7/5/2010 11:00 AM, Douglas Hunt wrote: > > Hi Chris: I would appreciate not making > Devel::REPL a hard dependency for PDL just yet. > I've got a large software system built with PDL > which I maintain RPMs for all the PDL > dependencies. Adding a raft of new dependencies, > even pure perl, would mess me up in the short term. > > Thanks, > Doug Hunt
No worries, mate. :-) As you can see in the excerpt of my response below. My plan is to have a soft dependency on Devel::REPL and the PDL shell will use the Perldl2 version if that capability is available and the perldl version if not. Since it is pure perl, there is no problem just installing Devel::REPL after PDL and have the pdl2 just start working. --Chris > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Chris Marshall wrote: >> >> My current plan is not to add a hard dependency to PDL on >> Devel::REPL. However, the improved functionality of pdl2 >> and the not too difficult install of Devel::REPL suggest >> that it would not be too much of a hardship. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
