On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Matthew Kenworthy
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Whoa. I've *never* read any source install where the first step is
> 'install gcc'!
>
> Assuming gcc and make are available is considered pretty safe with linux.

You are missing the point. Available != pre-installed. PDL is
available too for that matter. You have to install them using the
package manager.

It makes to sense to say that using the package manager to install PDL
is less good than a source install because you have to write
platform-specific instructions, while at the same time ignoring the
platform-specific instructions you need to setup the build environment
needed to do a source install. Compare for example, with Mandriva:

Option 1:

urpmi perl-PDL

Option 2:

urpmi gcc make glibc-devel
perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install PDL


Yes, in option 2 the last two lines are the sae for all platforms. But
the first line is just as platform specific as the single line in
option 1 that you are trying to replace.

I think there is a huge inconsistency in saying that it's no issue to
get people to install gcc, make and glibc-devel but it is an issue to
install the PDL package. IMO, that makes no sense. If you think that
installing gcc, make and glibc-devel is easy, then installing the
pre-built PDL binary is easier. In turn, if you think that installing
the PDL binary is less than ideal, then installing gcc, make and
glibc-devel is even less ideal.

Daniel.
-- 
Intolerant people should be shot.

_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to